Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-5960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3047 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5960X
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $160.99 vs $1399.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-13700F - $0.3 vs $1.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-5960X - 723 vs 542 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5960X - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
542
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $160.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4180 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
723
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
15%
Price, $
$1399.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5960X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |