Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 2388 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Pentium Gold G6405 - 259 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $82.0 vs $429.95
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 58 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
848
73.10344827586206%
Multi-Core
1760
32.33510931471615%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |