Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-5820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2143 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $429.95 vs $1525.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $2.51 vs $8.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Core i7-5820K - 178 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 64 vs 12 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
171
96.06741573033707%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1566 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.57/FPS
29.288214702450404%
Price, $
$1525
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
70.09063444108762%
Multi-Core
5443
37.33452225804239%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell E | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |