Buy on Amazon
$185
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i7-4980HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1691 days newer than Core i7-4980HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4980HQ
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-4980HQ - 261 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4980HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
261
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler - YD260XBCAFBOX
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-4980HQ
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4980HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-4980HQ or Ryzen 5 2600X
Ready or Not, 1920 x 1080, Epic
74 FPS
$20.27/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Ryzen 5 2600X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
