Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4960HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4960HQ is 372 days older than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 47 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4960HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4960HQ
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4960HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
