Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $100.0 vs $273.15
- Up to 58% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-10900 - $0.47 vs $1.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-4930K - 245 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
42%
Price, $
$273.15
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |