Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1220 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $89.95 vs $150.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-7700T - $0.96 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4930K - 104 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
94
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15864 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |