Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i7-4850HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1595 days newer than Core i7-4850HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4850HQ
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 47 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4850HQ - 130 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4850HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4850HQ | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Crystal Well | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |