Buy on Amazon
$199.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2135 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $199.88 vs $267.05
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 11% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-4820K - 213 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 12 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7 i7-4820K 3.70 GHz Processor - Socket FCLGA2011 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 10 MB Cache - 5 GT/s DMI
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76688 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-core, 12-threads unlocked desktop processor with Wraith Spire cooler
Buy for $267.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
38.61502347417841%
Multi-Core
2440
33.78565494322902%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
