Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1550 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-4810MQ - 197 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |