Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1345 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4800MQ - 523 vs 512 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
523
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |