Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2633 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 47 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4800MQ - 196 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |