Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2401 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 47 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 13% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-4800MQ - 214 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 64 vs 8 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1675
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |