Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-4770S vs Core i9-11900K

Core i7-4770S vs Core i9-11900K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-4770S

3.1 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-4770S Logo
Intel Core i7-4770S Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.1 GHZ 8 MB Cache- BX80646I74770S

Buy for $115.74 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4151 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4151 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-4770S

3.1 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-4770S Logo
Intel Core i7-4770S Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.1 GHZ 8 MB Cache- BX80646I74770S

Buy for $115.74 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4151 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4151 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770S.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S

  • Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $115.74 vs $265.0
  • Up to 47% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-11900K - $0.66 vs $1.24 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K

  • Performs up to 22% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4770S - 214 vs 175 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770S - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of World of Warcraft.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Core i7-4770S Logo
Core i7-4770S

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013


FPS

175

81%

Value, $/FPS

$0.66/FPS

100%

Price, $

$115.74

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7-4770S Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.1 GHZ 8 MB Cache- BX80646I74770S

Buy for $115.74 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4151 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

214

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.24/FPS

53%

Price, $

$265

43%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4151 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Core i7-4770S Logo
Core i7-4770S

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-4770S Logo
Core i7-4770S

Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013


Single-Core

1149

48%

Multi-Core

3579

32%

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2371

100%

Multi-Core

10948

100%

Intel Core i7-4770S Logo

Intel Core i7-4770S

vs
Intel Core i9-11900K Logo

Intel Core i9-11900K

Jun 2nd, 2013Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7CollectionCore i9
HaswellCodenameRocket Lake
Intel Socket 1150SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
8
8Threads
16
3.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz
65 W
TDP125 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
31.0xMultiplier
35.0x
Intel HD 4600Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Core i7-4770S or Core i9-11900K

World of Warcraft, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.