Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $119.0 vs $1150.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.94 vs $8.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4770S - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770S - 48 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.98/FPS
10%
Price, $
$1150
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |