Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4765T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1916 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $498.95 vs $1075.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $2.41 vs $4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-4765T - 219 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 32 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
207
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 536 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.91/FPS
49%
Price, $
$1075
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 536 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |