Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1782 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i7-4765T - 270 vs 265 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $144.95 vs $498.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-4765T - $0.54 vs $1.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $144.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |