Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-4712MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2573 days newer than Core i7-4712MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 39% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-4712MQ - 176 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4712MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |