Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i7-4710MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2573 days newer than Core i7-4710MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 47 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4710MQ - 183 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710MQ - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4710MQ | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |