Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-4710HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2221 days newer than Core i7-4710HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-4710HQ - 272 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |