Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i7-4610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3160 days newer than Core i7-4610M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 37 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-4610M - 199 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$460.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $460.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |