Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i7-4610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1704 days newer than Core i7-4610M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 37 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Core i7-4610M - 187 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 48 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |