Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-4610M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1538 days newer than Core i7-4610M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 37 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-4610M - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4610M - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1875 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-4610M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2014
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4610M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-4610M or Ryzen 7 2700X
Stray, 1920 x 1080, High
90 FPS
$15.56/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
