Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i7-4600U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3412 days newer than Core i7-4600U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-4600U - 131 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600U - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4600U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
