Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3781 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 132% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-4600M - 353 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 32 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
353
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$521.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57739 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1026
33.973509933774835%
Multi-Core
1956
10.70607553366174%
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
37 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |