Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3970X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3617 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3970X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $249.88 vs $460.24
- Up to 21% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900K - $2.23 vs $2.81 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 46% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3970X - 164 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
112
68%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $249.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.81/FPS
79%
Price, $
$460.24
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $460.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |