Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3970X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3057 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3970X
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $217.44 vs $265.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-11900K - $1.28 vs $1.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3970X - 187 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
170
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$217.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $217.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1590 minutes ago
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3970X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |