Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4069 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3930K - 287 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $138.98 vs $280.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-3930K - $0.48 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 60 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9567 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9567 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |