Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 532 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6350 - 377 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $99.99 vs $280.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-3930K - $0.27 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
377
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
36.48648648648649%
Price, $
$280
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
372
98.6737400530504%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |