Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2999 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3820 - 160 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $225.99 vs $319.88
- Up to 33% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3820 - $1.41 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1188 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |