Buy on Amazon
$151
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600T is 2240 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600T - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600T
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-3820 - 129 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $122.54 vs $151.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-3820 - $0.95 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 35 vs 130 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
120
93.02325581395348%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
75.39682539682539%
Price, $
$151
81%
CM8061901049606 Core i7 i7-3820 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA-2011
Buy for $151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
SIVOYEEL CPU Processor Intel Core I5-8600T I5 8600T 2.3 GHz Six-Core Six-Thread CPU Processor 9M 35W LGA 1151
Buy for $122.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
49.007148530579826%
Multi-Core
2299
49.31359931359932%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
