Buy on Amazon
$151
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600 is 2193 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Core i7-3820 - 719 vs 680 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $104.0 vs $151.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-3820 - $0.16 vs $0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
680
94.57579972183588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
72.72727272727273%
Price, $
$151
68%
CM8061901049606 Core i7 i7-3820 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA-2011
Buy for $151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Core i5-8600
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
719
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$104
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-8600 Desktop Processor 6 Core up to 4.3GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $104 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Core i5-8600
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
42.37637362637363%
Multi-Core
2299
45.73304157549234%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
