Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3613 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $319.88 vs $899.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12400F - $1.61 vs $4.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i7-3820 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
199
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.39/FPS
36%
Price, $
$899.99
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |