Buy on Amazon
$151
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $151.0 vs $195.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 1700 - $1.35 vs $1.67 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
95.72649572649573%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$151
100%
Value Winner
CM8061901049606 Core i7 i7-3820 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA-2011
Buy for $151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5081 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
80.83832335329342%
Price, $
$195
77%
FPS Winner
AMD YD1700BBAEBOX Ryzen 7 1700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
61.39303482587065%
Multi-Core
2299
45.07843137254902%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
