Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 476 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2500K - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $24.99 vs $143.5
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $143.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Buy for $24.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
91.37199434229137%
Multi-Core
1921
77.80477926285946%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |