Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $175.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-13400F - $1.08 vs $4.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 31% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770K - 212 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
162
76%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9021 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.25/FPS
25%
Price, $
$899.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9021 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |