Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3243 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 28% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770K - 208 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $165.86 vs $175.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770K - $0.8 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |