Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1640 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 96% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $64.78 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 77 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3770 - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 44 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $64.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76920 minutes ago
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76920 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
57.1063829787234%
Multi-Core
2299
23.900613369373115%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 22 |
8 | Threads | 44 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 145 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |