Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2315 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $90.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.96 vs $10.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770 - 104 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.34/FPS
9%
Price, $
$1075
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |