Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2342 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 45 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 17% better in New World than Core i7-3635QM - 116 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 56 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-3635QM
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 28 |
| 8 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 255 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
