Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3433 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3635QM - 379 vs 321 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |