Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i7-3630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2769 days newer than Core i7-3630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3630QM - 137 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3630QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |