Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i7-3610QE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3902 days newer than Core i7-3610QE.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QE
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3610QE - 423 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3610QE - 32 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$747.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $747.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QE | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |