Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3867 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 14% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-3520M - 133 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 24 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-3520M
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3520M
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
568
21.45015105740181%
Multi-Core
1152
8.365405562413768%
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
