Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3657 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-2860QM - 240 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
560
24.369016536118362%
Multi-Core
1670
16.711698188732115%
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
