Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3481 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2860QM - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1381 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |