Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3229 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2860QM - 138 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $392.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |