Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2738 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $87.99 vs $299.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-9900T - $0.23 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-2700K - 416 vs 380 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
380
91.34615384615384%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $87.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
416
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
31.944444444444446%
Price, $
$299
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
46.33635729239358%
Multi-Core
2264
37.7711044377711%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |