Buy on Amazon
$89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2117 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $89.0 vs $221.76
- Up to 57% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.96 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-2700K - 99 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4966 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
42%
Price, $
$221.76
40%
FPS Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
