Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2564 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-2675QM - 229 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$385
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Single-Core
449
26.918465227817745%
Multi-Core
1385
17.399497487437184%
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |